Any comments would be appreciated.

Description: Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout()
to guarantee the task delays as expected.

Signed-off-by: Maximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
---


 kj-domen/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c~msleep-drivers_scsi_ibmvscsi drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c
--- kj/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c~msleep-drivers_scsi_ibmvscsi	2004-12-25 01:34:53.000000000 +0100
+++ kj-domen/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c	2004-12-25 01:34:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <asm/vio.h>
 #include <scsi/scsi.h>
 #include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h>
@@ -1327,8 +1328,7 @@ static int ibmvscsi_probe(struct vio_dev
 		     time_before(jiffies, wait_switch) &&
 		     atomic_read(&hostdata->request_limit) < 0;) {
 
-			set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-			schedule_timeout(HZ / 100);
+			msleep(10);
 		}
 
 		/* if we now have a valid request_limit, initiate a scan */
_