Hi,

Please consider applying.

Description: Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task
delays as expected. The current code uses TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; however, it does
not check for signals, so I do not think the change to msleep() is necessarily
bad.

Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@austin.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
---


 kj-domen/fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c~msleep-fs_jfs_jfs_logmgr fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c
--- kj/fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c~msleep-fs_jfs_jfs_logmgr	2005-01-23 00:24:16.000000000 +0100
+++ kj-domen/fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c	2005-01-23 00:24:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
 #include <linux/buffer_head.h>		/* for sync_blockdev() */
 #include <linux/bio.h>
 #include <linux/suspend.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include "jfs_incore.h"
 #include "jfs_filsys.h"
 #include "jfs_metapage.h"
@@ -1612,8 +1613,7 @@ void jfs_flush_journal(struct jfs_log *l
 	 */
 	if ((!list_empty(&log->cqueue)) || !list_empty(&log->synclist)) {
 		for (i = 0; i < 800; i++) {	/* Too much? */
-			current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-			schedule_timeout(HZ / 4);
+			msleep(250);
 			if (list_empty(&log->cqueue) &&
 			    list_empty(&log->synclist))
 				break;
_